Abstract
AbstractIn welding of high-strength steels, e.g. for foundations and erection structures of wind energy plants, unacceptable defects can occasionally be found in the weld area, which should be removed by thermal gouging and subsequent re-welding. High shrinkage restraint of repair welds may lead to crack formation and component failure, predominantly in interaction with degraded microstructures and mechanical properties due to repair cycles. This study aims for elaboration of recommendations for repair concepts appropriate to the stresses and materials involved to avoid cold cracking, damage and expensive reworking. In part 1 [1] of this study, systematic investigations of influences of shrinkage restraint on residual stresses and cold cracking risk during repair welding of two high-strength steels S500MLO for offshore application and S960QL for mobile crane structures were focussed. In this part 2, the microstructure, particularly hardness, and residual stresses due to gouging and influences of heat control parameters in repair welding are analysed. A clear reduction in residual stress after gouging can be observed, especially for the specimens with restrained transverse shrinkage. Gouging to a depth of approx. 2/3 of the seam height does not lead to a complete relaxation of the observed reaction forces. Particularly for the higher strength steel S960QL, there are pronounced areas influenced by the gouging process in which a degradation of the microstructure and properties should be assumed. Overall, the repair welds show a significant increase in the width of the weld and HAZ compared to the original weld, especially in the case of S960QL/G89. The repair welds show higher welding-induced stresses than the original welds, especially in the areas of the HAZ and the base metal close to the weld seam. This behaviour can be attributed overall to increased restraint conditions due to the remaining root weld or shorter gouge grooves. In good agreement with earlier investigations, the residual stresses transverse to the weld can be significantly reduced by upwardly limited working or interpass temperatures, and the reaction stresses resulting from high restraint conditions can be effectively counteracted. The influence of the heat input on the stress formation is low compared to the interpass temperature for both test materials.
Funder
Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Schroepfer D, Witte J, Kromm A, Kannengiesser T (2024) Stresses in repair welding of high-strength steels—Part 1: Restraint and cold cracking risk. Weld World 68:685–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-024-01691-y
2. Beiter P, Rand JT, Seel J, Lantz E, Gilman P, Wiser R (2022) Expert perspectives on the wind plant of the future. Wind Energy 25:1363–1378. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2735
3. Keehan E, Karlsson L, Andren HO, Bhadeshia HKDH (2006) New developments with C-Mn-Ni high-strength steel weld metals — part B. Mech Properties Weld J 09:218–224
4. Schasse R, Kannengiesser T, Kromm A, Mente T (2015) Residual stresses in repair welds of high-strength low-alloy steels. Weld World 59:757–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-015-0257-9
5. Guyot S, Dubois JM, Bryla P (2009) Welding reparation on thermo-mechanical HSS. In: Conference on high strength steels for hydropower plants. Japan Electric Power Civil Engineering Association, Takasaki