Author:
Gangi Michael J.,Lattimer Brian Y.,Case Scott W.
Abstract
AbstractThe stacking sequence of laminated wood significantly impacts the composite mechanical behavior of the material, especially when scaling down thermo-mechanical tests on plywood. In previous research, we developed a scaling methodology for thermo-structural tests on samples with similar cross sections, however this paper focused on testing plywood samples with different stacking sequences between the scales. Plywood samples at ½-scale and ¼-scale were subjected to combined bending and thermal loading, with the loading scaled to have the same initial static bending stresses. While the ¼-scale 4-layer [0°/90°]s laminate and the ½-scale 8-layer [0°/90°/90°/0°]s laminate had an equal number of 0° and 90° layers, as the char front progresses, the sections behave differently. Thus, modeling becomes essential to extrapolating the data from the smaller ¼-scale test to predict the behavior of the larger ½-scale test. Reduced cross-sectional area models (RCAM) incorporating classical laminated plate theory were used to predict the mechanical response of the composite samples as the char front increased. Three methods were proposed for calibrating the RCAM models: Fourier number scaling, from detailed kinetics-based pyrolysis GPyro models, and fitting to data from fire exposure thermal response tests. The models calibrated with the experimental char measurements produced the most accurate predictions. The experimental char models validated to predict the behavior of the ¼-scale tests within 2.5%, were then able to predict the ½-scale test behavior within 4.5%.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Abu-Bakar AS, Moinuddin KAM (2012) Effects of variation in heating rate, sample mass and nitrogen flow on chemical kinetics for pyrolysis. In: proceedings of the 18th australasian fluid mechanics conference, AFMC 2012, October 2017
2. Alves SS, Figueiredo JL (1989) A model for pyrolysis of wet wood. Chem Eng Sci 44(12):2861–2869. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(89)85096-1
3. ASTM (2022) ASTM E119 standard test methods for fire tests of building construction and materials. In ASTM International (Issue 1). ASTM International
4. AWC (2018) NDS national design specifications for wood construction: with commentary. American Wood Council.
5. Bausano JV, Lesko JJ, Case SW (2006) Composite life under sustained compression and one sided simulated fire exposure: Characterization and prediction. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 37(7):1092–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.013