Measuring the Success of a Project ECHO Implementation: Results from an International e-Delphi Study
-
Published:2022-08-10
Issue:3
Volume:2
Page:179-194
-
ISSN:2662-9275
-
Container-title:Global Implementation Research and Applications
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Glob Implement Res Appl
Author:
Moss PerrinORCID, Hartley NicoleORCID, Newcomb Dana, Russell TrevorORCID
Abstract
AbstractThere is an increasing global need for organisations to utilise high-quality telementoring models to support workforce development and mentorship. Project ECHO is a validated telementoring model that has been adopted by over 700 organisations globally across multiple sectors. To date there is no consolidated list of success indicators by which organisational teams can assess or benchmark their implementation of Project ECHO across sectors. An e-Delphi methodology was adopted to facilitate a comprehensive means of identifying indicators that could be used to assess the implementations of Project ECHO globally. This paper presents a consolidated framework of indicators that support teams to assess their implementation of Project ECHO. These indicators have been derived by an international panel of experts across the healthcare, education, and university sectors. The final framework identified 54 distinct indicators across four domains: (1) spoke participant engagement, (2) ECHO Hub/teleECHO Network design and operation, (3) ECHO Hub team engagement and (4) Local Impact. This paper highlights that Project ECHO implementation indicators can vary between being dynamic, static, and iterative, depending on the phase of implementation. These findings are significant because they are generalisable to any organisation/sector implementing Project ECHO or similar telementoring models.
Funder
The University of Queensland
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference51 articles.
1. Adler, M., & Ziglio, E. (Eds.). (1996). Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. 2. Agley, J., Delong, J., Janota, A., Carson, A., Roberts, J., & Maupome, G. (2021). Reflections on Project ECHO: Qualitative findings from five different ECHO programs. Medical Education Online, 26(1), 1936435. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1936435 3. Arora, S., Kalishman, S., Dion, D., Som, D., Thornton, K., Bankhurst, A., et al. (2011). Partnering urban academic medical centers and rural primary care clinicians to provide complex chronic disease care. Health affairs (Project Hope), 30(6), 1176–1184. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0278 4. Arora, S., Mate, K. S., Jones, J. L., Sevin, C. B., Clewett, E., Langley, G., et al. (2020). Enhancing collaborative learning for quality improvement: Evidence from the improving clinical flow project, a breakthrough series collaborative with project ECHO. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 46(8), 448–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.04.013 5. Arora, S., Thornton, K., Murata, G., Deming, P., Kalishman, S., Dion, D., et al. (2011). Outcomes of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection by primary care providers. The New England Journal of Medicine, 364(23), 2199–2207. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009370
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|