Abstract
AbstractEvidence-based interventions have the potential to improve health and well-being, but their effectiveness depends, among other things, on the challenging act of balancing between fidelity and adaptation, referred to as the fidelity-adaptation dilemma. After initial implementation, it is primarily professionals delivering evidence-based interventions to end users that face the dilemma, but research about how professionals relate to and perceive it is limited. This study aims to describe professionals’ attitudes towards the dilemma and investigate the associations between professional attitudes and individual and organisational implementation determinants, individual characteristics, and work-life consequences for the professionals. Using a cross-sectional design, 103 professionals working with an evidence-based parental support programme ABC (All Children in Focus) were surveyed on attitudes towards the fidelity-adaptation dilemma, implementation determinants, and work-life consequences. Data were analysed using two-step cluster analysis. Three profile groups summarize professionals’ attitudes: one preferring fidelity (the adherers, n = 31), one preferring adaptations (the adapters, n = 50), and one with a dual view on fidelity and adaptation (the double-minded, n = 18). The adherers, the ones preferring fidelity, reported higher levels of skills, knowledge, openness, work-related self-efficacy, meaning of work, and possibilities for development, and a lower level of role conflict and unreasonable tasks compared to the adapters. Professionals with a positive attitude towards fidelity reports experiencing more job resources and a lower level of job demands compared to professionals who are more positive towards adaptation. The study shows that the fidelity-adaptation dilemma is at play during the sustainment phase of implementation and suggest that it has consequences for professionals working life.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC