1. Assaz, D. A., Roche, B., Kanter, J. W., & Oshiro, C. K. (2018). Cognitive defusion in acceptance and commitment therapy: What are the basic processes of change? The Psychological Record, 68(4), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0254-z
2. Assaz, D. A., Tyndall, I., Oshiro, C. K. B., & Roche, B. (2023). A process-based analysis of cognitive defusion in acceptance and commitment therapy. Behavior Therapy, 54(6), 1020–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2022.06.003
3. Barnes-Holmes, Y., Foody, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., & McHugh, L. (2013). Advances in research on deictic relations and perspective-taking. In S. Dymond & B. Roche (Eds.), Advances in relational frame theory: Research and application (pp. 127–148). Context Press/New Harbinger.
4. Barnes-Holmes, Y., Hussey, I., McEnteggart, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Foody, M. (2016). Scientific ambition: The relationship between relational frame theory and middle level terms in acceptance and commitment therapy. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 365–382). Wiley-Blackwell.
5. Barnes-Holmes, D., Finn, M., McEnteggart, C., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2018). Derived stimulus relations and their role in a behavior-analytic account of human language and cognition. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41(1), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0124-7