Abstract
AbstractThe present study focusses on optimising a single supported excavation pit to achieve a more economical design using finite element analyses. Two methods for automating the derivation of the excavation pit’s necessary embedment depth are presented, which involve either embedment depth reduction using additional calculation phases or adapting the entire model with renewed discretisation. The bending moments as well as the earth pressure distribution along the wall show good agreement, indicating that both methods are suitable for application. Subsequently, the feasibility of using optimisation algorithms (Particle Swarm Optimisation and Differential Evolution) for dimensioning the single supported excavation pit regarding stress analysis of the wall is investigated. Therefore, the embedment depth and the position of the strut are varied for five different sheet pile walls and three different strut profiles. The results demonstrate that both algorithms perform well, particularly with a higher number of calculation steps. After varying iteration steps and population size, the Differential Evolution approach shows better performance compared to Particle Swarm Optimisation by means of finding the optimal solution after a lower number of computational steps.
Funder
Helmut-Schmidt-Universität Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geology,Soil Science,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Architecture
Reference44 articles.
1. Brinkgreve RBJ, Post M (2013) On the use of finite element models for geotechnical design. In: Grabe J (eds) Bemessen mit numerischen Methoden: Workshop, 24/25. September 2013, Hamburg. Techn. Univ. Hamburg-Harburg Inst. für Geotechnik und Baubetrieb, Hamburg, pp 111–122
2. Cheng YM, Li L, Chi S, Wei WB (2007) Particle swarm optimization algorithm for the location of the critical non-circular failure surface in two-dimensional slope stability analysis. Comput Geotech 34:92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2006.10.012
3. EAB (2021) Empfehlungen des Arbeitskreises “Baugruben” (EAB), 6th edn. Ernst & Sohn, Berlin
4. EANG (2014) Empfehlungen des Arbeitskreises “Numerik in der Geotechnik” (EANG), 1st edn. Ernst & Sohn, Berlin
5. Ebid AM (2021) 35 Years of (AI) in geotechnical engineering: State of the art. Geotech Geol Eng 39:637–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01536-7