Consideration of the Accuracy of Empirical and Indirect Laboratory Methods for the Characterisation of Tension Strength

Abstract

AbstractThis research explores the results of the most common laboratory based indirect tension strength methods over the range of UCS strengths 0.1 MPa (cemented paste backfill) to 100 MPa (concrete). The accuracy of each of the methods is considered through a comparison with direct strength measurements completed on the same material. The results of 241 individual tests suggest that the use of indirect tension methods to determine tension strength for all geo-material strength ranges may provide misleading results unless a correction-factor is applied. Correction factors that relate splitting and flexure results to direct tension results are provided. The correction factors are based on the characteristic UCS of the material. A comparison of the traditional empirical relationship to derive tension from UCS is presented and an updated relationship is proposed that is relevant over the UCS strength range 0.1–100 MPa.