Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nuclear Energy and Engineering,Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Reference48 articles.
1. X. Yang, H. Peng, The use of noise equivalent count rate and the NEMA phantom for PET image quality evaluation. Phys. Med. 31, 179–184 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.01.003
2. A. Ketabi, P. Ghafarian, M.A. Mosleh-Shirazi et al., The influence of using different reconstruction algorithms on sensitivity of quantitative 18F-FDG-PET volumetric measures to background activity variation. Iran. J. Nucl. Med. 26, 87–97 (2018)
3. A. Mehranian, M.R. Ay, A. Rahmim et al., 3D prior image constrained projection completion for X-ray CT metal artifact reduction. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 60, 3318–3332 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2013.2275919
4. G. Reynés-Llompart, A. Sabaté-Llobera, E. Llinares-Tello et al., Image quality evaluation in a modern PET system: impact of new reconstructions methods and a radiomics approach. Sci. Rep. 9, 10640 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46937-8
5. J. Yan, J. Schaefferkoette, M. Conti et al., A method to assess image quality for low-dose PET: analysis of SNR, CNR, bias and image noise. Cancer Imaging 16, 26 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0086-0