Abstract
AbstractThis research aimed to assess changes in mean and extreme rainfall within the Kaduna River Basin (KRB), specifically examining the implications of two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs)—4.5 and 8.5 scenarios. Employing a quantile mapping technique, this study corrected inherent biases in four Regional Climate Models, enabling the examination of mean precipitation and six indices capturing extreme precipitation events for the 2050s. These findings were compared against a historical reference period spanning from 1981 to 2010, considering the basin's upstream and downstream segments. Results revealed an average annual rainfall reduction under scenarios 4.5 (21.39%) and 8.5 (20.51%) across the basin. This decline exhibited a more pronounced impact on monthly rainfall during the wet season (April to October) compared to the dry season (November to March). Notably, a substantial decrement in wet indices, excluding consecutive wet days (CWD), was foreseen in both seasons for the upstream and downstream areas, signalling an impending drier climate. The anticipated rise in consecutive dry days (CDD) is poised to manifest prominently downstream attributed to global warming-induced climate change brought on by increased anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases. These findings accentuate a heterogeneous distribution of extreme rainfall, potentially leading to water scarcity issues throughout the KRB, especially impacting upstream users. Moreover, the projections hint at an increased risk of flash floods during intense wet periods. Consequently, this study advocates the implementation of targeted disaster risk management strategies within the KRB to address these foreseeable challenges.
Funder
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers [MassonDelmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. B. R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu and B. Zhou (ed.)]. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, In press, Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM.pdf
2. Dosio A, et al. ‘What can we know about future rainfall in Africa? Robustness, significance and added value of projections from a large ensemble of regional climate models. Clim Dyn. 2019;53(9–10):5833–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00382-019-04900-3.
3. IPCC WGI Technical Support Unit. ‘Working Group I Contribution To The IPCC Fifth Assessment Report Climate Change 2013 : The Physical Science Basis Final Draft Underlying Scientific-Technical Assessment A report accepted by Working Group I of the IPCC but not approved in detail. 2014.
4. Dosio A, et al. Projected future daily characteristics of African rainfall based on global (CMIP5, CMIP6) and regional (CORDEX, CORDEX-CORE) climate models. Clim Dyn. 2021;57(11–12):3135–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05859-w.
5. Dosio A, et al. A tale of two futures: contrasting scenarios of future rainfall for West Africa from an ensemble of regional climate models. Environ Res Lett. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7fde.