On the Potential for Improved Measurement in the Human and Social Sciences-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

On the Potential for Improved Measurement in the Human and Social Sciences

Published:2013 Issue: Volume: Page:1-11
ISSN:
Container-title:Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS) 2012 Conference Proceeding
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Fisher William P.,Stenner A. Jackson

Publisher

Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-37592-7_1

Reference48 articles.

1. Ackermann, J. R. (1985). Data, instruments, and theory: A dialectical approach to understanding science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

2. Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences;D Andrich,1988

3. Bejar, I., Lawless, R. R., Morley, M. E., Wagner, M. E., Bennett, R. E., & Revuelta, J. (2003). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(3), 1–29.

4. Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

5. Boumans, M. (2005). How economists model the world into numbers. New York: Routledge.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Theory Based Instrument Calibration in the Natural Sciences: What Can the Social Sciences Learn?;Explanatory Models, Unit Standards, and Personalized Learning in Educational Measurement;2022-10-16

2. Separation Theorems in Econometrics and Psychometrics: Rasch, Frisch, Two Fishers and Implications for Measurement;Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics;2021-08-23

3. Bateson and Wright on Number and Quantity: How to Not Separate Thinking from Its Relational Context;Symmetry;2021-08-03

4. An online platform for sociocognitive metrology: the BEAR Assessment System Software;Measurement Science and Technology;2019-12-30

5. Adaptive Measurement and Assessment;Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior;2016-03-21