1. Cruz, J.Y. (1986). Ellipsoidal corrections to potential coefficients obtained from gravity anomaly data on the ellipsoid. Report No. 371 from the Dept. of Geod. Sci. and Surv., The Ohio State Univ.
2. Heck, B. (1991). On the linearized boundary value problems of physical geodesy. Report No. 407 from the Dept. of Geod. Sci. and Surv., The Ohio State Univ.
3. Holota, P. (1984). A new approach to iterations in solving geodetic boundary value problem for real topography. Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Geod. and Phys. of the Earth, Magdeburg, 1984. Veroff. d. Zentralinst. f. Phys. d. Erde, Nr. 81(1985), Teil II, pp. 4–15.
4. Holota, P. (1991). On the iteration solution of the geodetic boundary-value problem and some model refinements. Contribution to Geodetic Theory and Methodology. XXth General Assembly of the IUGG, IAG-Sec. IV, Vienna, 1991. Politecnico di Milano, 1991, pp. 31–60; also in: Travaux de l’Association Internationale de Geodesie, Tome 29, Paris 1992, pp. 260–289.
5. Holota, P. (1992). Integral representation of the disturbing potential: Effects involved, iteration technique and its convergence. Holota, P. and Vermeer, M. (eds.): Proc. 1st continental workshop on the geoid in Europe, Prague, 1992. Research Inst, of Geod., Topogr. and Cartogr., Prague, in co-operation with IAG-Subcommission for the geoid in Europe, Prague, pp. 402–419.