Devil in the Details: A Critical Review of “Theoretical Loss”-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Devil in the Details: A Critical Review of “Theoretical Loss”

Published:2015-12-15 Issue:3 Volume:32 Page:865-875
ISSN:1573-3602
Container-title:Journal of Gambling Studies
language:en
Short-container-title:J Gambl Stud

Author:

Tom Matthew A.,Shaffer Howard J.

Funder

bwin.party Digital Entertainment

Aarhus Universitet (DK) via the Danish Research Council

Foundation for Advancing Alcohol Responsibility

City of Cambridge, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security via Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP)

Integrated Centre on Addiction Prevention and Treatment of the Tung Wah Group of Hospitals (which receives funding from The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust)

Office of the Sheriff, County of Worcester Jail and House of Correction via the Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Massachusetts Gaming Commission

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Psychology,Sociology and Political Science

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10899-015-9584-4.pdf

Reference24 articles.

1. Auer, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2013). Voluntary limit setting and player choice in most intense online gamblers: An empirical study of gambling behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(4), 647–660. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9332-y .

2. Auer, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014). An empirical investigation of theoretical loss and gambling intensity. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(4), 879–887. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9376-7 .

3. Auer, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Theoretical loss and gambling intensity (revisited): A response to Braverman et al. (2013). Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(3), 921–931. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9463-4 .