Outcomes of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with a minimum follow-up of 7-year-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Outcomes of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with a minimum follow-up of 7-year

Published:2022-08-20 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1432-1068
Container-title:European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
language:en
Short-container-title:Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

Author:

Núñez Jorge H.^ORCID,Escudero Berta,Omiste Irene,Martínez-Peñas Judith,Surroca Maria,Alonzo-González Francisco,Bosch-García David

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00590-022-03365-1.pdf

Reference41 articles.

1. Hoy D, March L, Woolf A, Blyth F, Brooks P, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, Blore J, Murray C, Burstein R, Buchbinder R (2014) The global burden of neck pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 73:1309–1315. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204431

2. Neifert SN, Martini ML, Yuk F, McNeill IT, Caridi JM, Steinberger J, Oermann EK (2020) Predicting trends in cervical spinal surgery in the United States from 2020 to 2040. World Neurosurg 141:e175–e181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.055

3. Saifi C, Fein AW, Cazzulino A, Lehman RA, Phillips FM, An HS, Riew KD (2018) Trends in resource utilization and rate of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion throughout the United States from 2006 to 2013. Spine J 18:1022–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.072

4. Zhang D, Liu B, Zhu J, Li C, Wei F, Yuan Y, Zhu D (2019) Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between self-locking stand-alone cage and cage with anterior plate for multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 125:e117–e131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.218

5. Buttermann GR (2018) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion outcomes over 10 Years: a prospective study. Spine 43:207–214. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002273

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Efficacy of Second-Generation Cervical Spine Arthroplasty: A 5-Year Perspective;Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique;2024-07-31

2. Restoration of Range of Motion in the Cervical Spine through Single-Segment Artificial Disc Replacement Using the Baguera®C Prosthesis;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2024-04-02

3. Heterotopic ossification, osteolysis and implant failure following cervical total disc replacement with the M6-C™ artificial disc;European Spine Journal;2024-02-16

4. [Translated article] Less superior adjacent syndrome and lower reoperation rate. Medium- and long-term results of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials;Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología;2023-11

5. Menor síndrome adyacente superior y menor tasa de reoperación. Resultados a mediano y largo plazo de la artroplastia cervical frente a la artrodesis cervical anterior: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados;Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología;2023-07