Soil–Geosynthetic Interaction Under Triaxial Conditions: Shear Strength Increase and Influence of the Specimen Dimensions

Author:

Anjos RafaelORCID,Carlos David MirandaORCID,Gouveia SóniaORCID,Pinho-Lopes MargaridaORCID,Powrie WilliamORCID

Abstract

AbstractGeosynthetics are extensible reinforcements used to enhance the engineering performance of a soil. The transfer of stresses from the soil to the reinforcement is achieved through soil–geosynthetic interaction. The proposals from the literature to assess the shear strength of the reinforced soil under triaxial conditions use three different approaches. These involve analysing the reinforced soil: (i) as a homogeneous composite material (Approach A), (ii) as two different materials (Approach B), or (iii) as soil having the same fundamental shear strength, with the effect of the reinforcement represented as an additional lateral or confining stress (Approach C). In this paper, triaxial tests data of a soil reinforced with a geosynthetic, and specimens with different dimensions (diameters 70 and 150 mm) were used to assess changes in shear strength and to carry out a statistical analysis. The increases in shear strength of the reinforced soil and of the soil–geosynthetic interface were analysed using equations from the literature. The difference between the triaxial results obtained from specimens of different sizes was assessed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). When the joint term of the regression model was not statistically significant, the characterisation from different specimen sizes was used to generate soil failure envelopes. Thus, a new methodology to obtain a failure envelope with different specimen sizes is presented.

Funder

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

Portuguese Resilience Plan (PRR) through European Union – NextGenerationEU

Universidade de Aveiro

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Polymers and Plastics,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference26 articles.

1. Jewell RA (1996) Soil reinforcement with geotextiles, vol 123. Construction Industry Research and Information Association, London

2. Salgado R (2020) Forks in the road: rethinking modeling decisions that defined the teaching and practice of geotechnical engineering. In: International conference on geotechnical engineering education 2020 (GEE2020), pp 51–68. https://www.issmge.org/education/recorded-webinars/forks-in-the-road-rethinking-modeling-decisions-that-defined-teaching-and-practice-of-geotechnical-engineering. Accessed 28 Jun 2023

3. Lopes ML (2015) Soil-geosynthetic interaction. In: Shukla SK (ed) Geosynthetics and their applications, 2nd edn. Thomas Telford, London, pp 45–66

4. Lees AS (2017) Simulation of geogrid stabilisation by finite element analysis. In: 19th International conference on soil mechanics and goetechnical engineering. pp 1377–1380

5. Saez J (1997) Caracterizacion geomecanica de geotextiles [in Sapnish]. Curso sobre técnicas generales de refuerzo del terreno y sus aplicaciones. Centro de estudios y experimentación de obras públicas (CEDEX), Madrid

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3