Improving Violent Extremism Risk Communication among German Police Agencies: A Survey of Federal and State Threat Managers

Author:

Ritter LisaORCID,Weber Michael A.ORCID,Witt Rainer,Profes Valerie,Singh Jay P.ORCID,Endrass JérômeORCID,Rossegger AstridORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe effective communication of the risk of violent extremism using either numerical or semantic systems represents an important challenge for police agencies. The aim of the present study was to examine the perceived usefulness of an 8-category risk communication scheme widely used by German police. An online survey was completed by members of both federal as well as state police threat management teams throughout the country (N = 158). Results suggest that threat managers perceive the use of a common risk communication scheme to be crucial for successful cooperation across different police agencies to prevent acts of violent extremism. However, it was also found that threat managers do not share a mutual understanding of the meaning behind the eight risk categories in the present scheme. The authors review established best practices in the nomothetic and idiographic communication of risk and make constructive recommendations about how to improve the utility of the currently used system. If these recommendations are implemented, they could result in more effective preventative efforts by threat management teams collaborating throughout Germany, with positive implications for public safety and national security.

Funder

Bundesministerium des Innern, für Bau und Heimat

Universität Konstanz

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Applied Psychology

Reference45 articles.

1. Ahmed Y, Annovi C, Di Liddo M, Grinyer J, Lynch O, Marinone L, Rosato V, Varga C, Wulf L (2021) Participation: Methodologies and tools for risk assessment on radicalization and violent extremism. Retrieved from https://participation-in.eu/media/Methodologies-for-assessing-the-risk_-literature-and-critical-review-D6.1.pdf

2. Almvik R, Woods P (1998) The Brøset violence checklist (BVC) and the prediction of in-patient violence: Some preliminary results. Psychiatric Care 5(3):208–211

3. Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S (2007) A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci 2(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-40

4. Clemens F, Knieps M, Tekin S (2020) Untapped potential? A survey study with German police officers into suspect interviewing practices and the strategic use of evidence. J Forensic Psychol Res Pract 20(1):53–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2019.1684123

5. Cole J, Alison E, Cole B, Alison L (2013) Guidance for identifying people vulnerable to recruitment into violent extremism. University of Liverpool, School of Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3