Interrogative Specialists and False Confessions: Debunking the Con Artist Myth-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Interrogative Specialists and False Confessions: Debunking the Con Artist Myth

Published:2018-03-14 Issue:3 Volume:33 Page:233-243
ISSN:0882-0783
Container-title:Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:J Police Crim Psych

Author:

Beyer Bradford J.,Herndon James

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Applied Psychology

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11896-018-9263-3/fulltext.html

Reference55 articles.

1. Ainsworth PB (2002) Psychology and policing. Willan Publishing, Portland, OR

2. Bradford D, Goodman-Delahunty J (2008) Detecting deception in police investigations: implications for false confessions. Psychiatry Psychol Law 15:105–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710701873932

3. Brandl SG (2014) Criminal investigation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

4. Bull R, Soukara S (2009) Four studies of what really happens in police interviews. In: Lassiter GD, Meissner C (eds) Police interrogations and confessions: current research, practice and policy recommendations. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 249–263

5. Davis D, Leo RA (2012) Interrogation-related regulatory decline: ego depletion, failures of self-regulation, and the decision to confess. Psychol Public Policy Law 18(4):673–704

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Über einzelne Miranda-Fälle hinaus: andere berufliche Rollen;Durchführung von Miranda-Evaluierungen;2023

2. Beyond Individual Miranda Cases: Other Professional Roles;Conducting Miranda Evaluations;2019