Black Male Supervisors Navigating Racial Battle Fatigue: A Grounded Theory Approach

Author:

Sanders Terrance J.,Romosz Ann M.ORCID,Roman Renee L.,Moore Irvin E.

Abstract

AbstractA significantly relevant issue that affects Black men in the workplace is a condition known as racial battle fatigue (RBF). RBF fosters systemic and systematic occupational and economic disparities that are experienced by Black men more regularly than their White counterparts (Smith et al., 2007). This qualitative study utilized a constructivist grounded theory methodology based on interviews with 11 Black male supervisors to understand the meaning of their cognitive and behavioral experiences as they navigated microaggressions, microinequities, and vicarious racism. These experiences contribute to our understanding of RBF. The findings revealed that Black male supervisors in various industries encountered and experienced RBF in the workplace. In addition, this research revealed that participants were subjected to various subtle and overt forms of racial stress due to microlevel and macrolevel RBF. The participants’ stories identified epistemic employment injustice and white fear as obstacles and barriers that Black men in supervisory roles face because of RBF in the workplace. The study also indicated that participants deployed managing and coping strategies to address the emotional contagions and emotional trauma resulting from their experiences. This research has implications for workplace policy change initiatives, cultural training and education, intergroup dialog courses, and clinical health practitioners. Recommendations pertaining to interventions that address trauma, mental health, and maladaptive behaviors are provided.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference60 articles.

1. Adu, P. (2019). A step-by-step guide to qualitative data coding. Routledge.

2. Applebaum, B. (2021). Racial battle fatigue, epistemic exploitation, and willful ignorance. Philosophy of Education, 76(4), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.47925/76.4.060.

3. Arnold, N. W., Crawford, E. R., & Khalifa, M. (2016). Psychological heuristics and faculty of color: Racial battle fatigue and tenure/promotion. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(6), 890–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.11780891.

4. Bailey, A. (2014). The unlevel knowing field: An engagement with dotson’s third-order epistemic oppression. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 3(10), 62–68.

5. Bardwell, S. H. (2013). Conflict and communication in the workplace: An inquiry and findings from Xyz university’s study on religious tolerance and diversity suggesting ironies of cultural attitudes, free expression and conflict in an academic organization. Journal of Organizational Culture Communications and Conflict, 17(2), 1–28.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3