Well-being in Thailand: A Culturally Driven Grounded Inquiry Exploration of a Complex Construct
-
Published:2022-06-07
Issue:6
Volume:17
Page:3327-3347
-
ISSN:1871-2584
-
Container-title:Applied Research in Quality of Life
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Applied Research Quality Life
Author:
Suavansri PanitaORCID, Pichayayothin Nipat, Espinosa Patricia RodriguezORCID, Areekit Poonsub, Nilchantuk Chureerat, Jones Torin S., French Joanna J., Mam Emily, Moore Jessie B., Heaney Catherine A.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Well-being has long been recognized as a key construct in human history. Quantitative studies have been limited in their ability to uncover contextual and cultural nuances that can be leveraged to inform the promotion of well-being. The present study employed a qualitative approach informed by narrative inquiry to understand how individuals in a rapidly developing Asian country experience what it means to be well and what contributes to or detracts from their well-being.
Methods
A purposeful sample of 50 Thai adults living in Bangkok shared their personal stories of times when they experienced high and low levels of well-being. Data were inductively coded and analysed to identify key domains of participants’ well-being and their inter-connections.
Results
The results reflect three layers of well-being. Social relationships (i.e., family, friends and acquaintances, and relationships at work or education) are at the center of well-being in Thailand, connecting and supporting a second layer of eight constituent domains of well-being (experience of emotions, sense of self, finances, self-care, demands and responsibilities, thoughts and feelings about the future, personal health, spirituality). The third layer is composed of the societal and physical contexts that are formative for well-being.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest both universal and culturally unique components of well-being among Thai adults. Implications for the promotion of well-being in Thailand are discussed.
Funder
Stanford Thailand Research Consortium
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Life-span and Life-course Studies
Reference41 articles.
1. Althubaiti, A. (2016). Information bias in health research: Definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 2016(9), 211–217 2. Badash, I., Kleinman, N. P., Barr, S., Jang, J., Rahman, S., & Wu, B. W. (2017). Redefining health: The evolution of health ideas from antiquity to the era of value-based care. Cureus, 9(2), https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1018 3. Borrell-Carrio, F. (2004). The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: Principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. The Annals of Family Medicine, 2(6), 576–582 4. Clandinin, D. J., & Huber, J. (2010). Narrative inquiry.International Encyclopedia of Education,436–441 5. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156
|
|