Abstract
AbstractFuzzy cognitive maps (FCM) have recently gained ground in many engineering applications, mainly because they allow stakeholder engagement in reduced-form complex systems representation and modelling. They provide a pictorial form of systems, consisting of nodes (concepts) and node interconnections (weights), and perform system simulations for various input combinations. Due to their simplicity and quasi-quantitative nature, they can be easily used with and by non-experts. However, these features come with the price of ambiguity in output: recent literature indicates that changes in selected FCM parameters yield considerably different outcomes. Furthermore, it is not a priori known whether an FCM simulation would reach a fixed, unique final state (fixed point). There are cases where infinite, chaotic, or cyclic behaviour (non-convergence) hinders the inference process, and literature shows that the primary culprit lies in a parameter determining the steepness of the most common transfer functions, which determine the state vector of the system during FCM simulations. To address ambiguity in FCM outcomes, we propose a certain range for the value of this parameter, $${\uplambda }$$
λ
, which is dependent on the FCM layout, for the case of the log-sigmoid and hyperbolic tangent transfer functions. The analysis of this paper is illustrated through a novel software application, In-Cognitive, which allows non-experts to define the FCM layout via a Graphical User Interface and then perform FCM simulations given various inputs. The proposed methodology and developed software are validated against a real-world energy policy-related problem in Greece, drawn from the literature.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Management Science and Operations Research,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Strategy and Management,Modeling and Simulation,Numerical Analysis
Reference74 articles.
1. Abbaspour Onari M, Jahangoshai Rezaee M (2020) A fuzzy cognitive map based on Nash bargaining game for supplier selection problem: a case study on auto parts industry. Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-020-00606-1
2. Aguilar J, Contreras J (2010) The FCM designer tool. In: Glikas M (ed) Fuzzy cognitive maps: advances in theory, methodologies, tools and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 71–88
3. Amer M, Daim TU, Jetter A (2016) Technology roadmap through fuzzy cognitive map-based scenarios: the case of wind energy sector of a developing country. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 28:131–155
4. Amirkhani A, Papageorgiou EI, Mohseni A, Mosavi MR (2017) A review of fuzzy cognitive maps in medicine: taxonomy, methods, and applications. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 142:129–145
5. Amirkhani A, Papageorgiou EI, Mosavi MR, Mohammadi K (2018) A novel medical decision support system based on fuzzy cognitive maps enhanced by intuitive and learning capabilities for modeling uncertainty. Appl Math Comput 337:562–582
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献