Abstract
AbstractJ. Willard Gibbs derived the following equation to quantify the maximum work possible for a chemical reaction$${\text{Maximum work }} = \, - \Delta {\text{G}}_{{{\text{rxn}}}} = \, - \left( {\Delta {\text{H}}_{{{\text{rxn}}}} {-}{\text{ T}}\Delta {\text{S}}_{{{\text{rxn}}}} } \right) {\text{ constant T}},{\text{P}}$$
Maximum work
=
-
Δ
G
rxn
=
-
Δ
H
rxn
-
T
Δ
S
rxn
constant T
,
P
∆Hrxn is the enthalpy change of reaction as measured in a reaction calorimeter and ∆Grxn the change in Gibbs energy as measured, if feasible, in an electrochemical cell by the voltage across the two half-cells. To Gibbs, reaction spontaneity corresponds to negative values of ∆Grxn. But what is T∆Srxn, absolute temperature times the change in entropy? Gibbs stated that this term quantifies the heating/cooling required to maintain constant temperature in an electrochemical cell. Seeking a deeper explanation than this, one involving the behaviors of atoms and molecules that cause these thermodynamic phenomena, I employed an “atoms first” approach to decipher the physical underpinning of T∆Srxn and, in so doing, developed the hypothesis that this term quantifies the change in “structural energy” of the system during a chemical reaction. This hypothesis now challenges me to similarly explain the physical underpinning of the Gibbs–Helmholtz equation$${\text{d}}\left( {\Delta {\text{G}}_{{{\text{rxn}}}} } \right)/{\text{dT}} = - \Delta {\text{S}}_{{{\text{rxn}}}} \left( {\text{constant P}} \right)$$
d
Δ
G
rxn
/
dT
=
-
Δ
S
rxn
constant P
While this equation illustrates a relationship between ∆Grxn and ∆Srxn, I don’t understand how this is so, especially since orbital electron energies that I hypothesize are responsible for ∆Grxn are not directly involved in the entropy determination of atoms and molecules that are responsible for ∆Srxn. I write this paper to both share my progress and also to seek help from any who can clarify this for me.
Funder
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference14 articles.
1. Barieau, R.E.: The correct application of the Gibbs—Helmholtz equation to reversible galvanic cells in which several phases are in equilibrium at one of the electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72(9), 4023–4026 (1950). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01165a052
2. Two excellent reviews of Sadi Carnot’s work are: 1) Carnot, S.: Reflexions on the Motive Power of Fire. Edited and translated by Robert Fox. University Press (1986) and 2) Carnot, Sadi, E Clapeyron, and R Clausius. 1988. Reflections on the Motive Power of Fire by Sadi Carnot and Other Papers on the Second Law of Thermodynamics by E. Clapeyron and R. Clausius. Edited with an Introduction by E. Mendoza. Edited by E Mendoza. Mineola (N.Y.): Dover.
3. Dodge, B.F.: Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics, p. 71. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc, New York (1944)
4. Feynman, R. P., Robert B. L., Matthew L. S., Richard P. F.: The Feynman lectures on physics. Volume I. Mainly Mechanics, Radiation, and Heat. Vol. 1. The Feynman Lectures on Physics 1. Redwood City, Calif.: Addison-Wesley. pp. 1–2. (1989a)
5. Gerke, R.H.: Temperature coefficient of electromotive force of galvanic cells and the entropy of reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 44(8), 1684–1704 (1922)