Between Trust and Ambivalence: How Does Trainee Teachers’ Perception of the Relationship With Their Mentors Explain How Trainee Teachers Experience Their Work?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Between Trust and Ambivalence: How Does Trainee Teachers’ Perception of the Relationship With Their Mentors Explain How Trainee Teachers Experience Their Work?

Published:2023-11-23 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1874-785X
Container-title:Vocations and Learning
language:en
Short-container-title:Vocations and Learning

Author:

Maué Elisabeth^ORCID,Goller Michael^ORCID,Bonnes Caroline^ORCID,Kärner Tobias^ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe study aims to identify profiles of trainee teachers in terms of their stress and work experiences and to uncover profile differences in regard to dropout intentions and perceived relationships between trainee teachers and their mentors. Based on data from 1,756 German trainee teachers, three distinct stress and work experience profiles could be identified. Trainee teachers with high levels of stress and negative work experiences exhibit higher dropout intentions and experience their relationship with their mentors as less transparent, fair and trusting, and more ambivalent compared to trainee teachers with low levels of stress and positive work experiences. The results underline the importance of the relationship between mentors and trainee teachers for the professional development of future teachers.

Funder

Universität Konstanz

Universität Kassel

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12186-023-09340-z.pdf

Reference140 articles.

1. Abs, H. J., Döbrich, P., Gerlach-Jahn, A., & Klieme, E. (2009). Pädagogische Entwicklungsbilanzen an Studienseminaren (PEB-Sem). Auswahl und statistische Analyse der Erhebungsinstrumente [Pedagogical development measures at study seminars (PDM-Sem). Selection and statistical analysis of the survey instruments]. DIPF.

2. Admiraal, W. (2022). Teachers’ job demands, resources and job satisfaction: Secondary analyses of TALIS 2018 data from Flanders and the Netherlands. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(2), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i2.4141

3. Affolter, B. (2019). Engagement und Beanspruchung von Lehrpersonen in der Phase des Berufseintritts: Die Bedeutung von Zielorientierungen, Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen und Persönlichkeitsmerk-malen im JD-R Modell. [Teacher engagement and demands on teachers in the career entry phase: The importance of goal orientation, self-efficacy expectations and personality traits in the JD-R model]. Julius Klinkhardt.

4. Alston, G., & Hansman, C. (2021). Mentoring in adult education: Looking to the past, present, and future. In T. Rocco, M. C. Smith, R. C. Mizzi, L. Merriweather, & J. Hawley (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 107–115). Stylus Publishing.

5. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2021). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model. Mplus Web Notes: No. 21 (Version 11). https://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote21.pdf.