Abstract
AbstractProviding instructional explanations is a central skill of teachers. Using interactive simulations, we examined the explaining skills of 48 prospective teachers attending a teacher education program for accounting in vocational schools in Germany. We used a performance-based assessment that relies on explanatory quality as an indicator of teacher candidates’ explaining skills. Video analysis was used to assess the quality of prepared and impromptu explanations in respect of different quality aspects. We found that the prepared explanations of prospective teachers were of high quality in terms of student–teacher interaction and language. With respect to the quality of content (e.g., accuracy, multiple approaches to explaining) and representation (e.g., visualization, examples), prospective teachers performed significantly worse. The quality of teacher candidates’ improvised explanations was significantly lower. This was especially true for the quality of representations, the process structure, and the interaction between student and teacher. For four of the five quality criteria examined, no correlation could be found between the quality of prepared and improvised explanations. For the language criterion, however, there was a correlation between the two types of explaining situations. Implications on how to support teacher candidates in developing explaining skills during teacher education are discussed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference86 articles.
1. Adler, R. W., & Milne, M. J. (1997). Improving the quality of accounting students’ learning through action-oriented learning tasks. Accounting Education,6(3), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/096392897331442
2. Alles, M., Apel, J., Seidel, T., & Stürmer, K. (2019). How candidate teachers experience coherence in university education and teacher induction: The influence of perceived professional preparation at university and support during teacher induction. Vocations and Learning,12(1), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-018-9211-5
3. Andersson, P., & Köpsén, S. (2018). Maintaining competence in the initial occupation: Activities among vocational teachers. Vocations and Learning,11(2), 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-017-9192-9
4. Antera, S. (2021). Professional competence of vocational teachers: A conceptual review. Vocations and Learning,14(3), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-021-09271-7
5. Ball, D. L. (1988). Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy: Examining what prospective teachers bring to teacher education [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Michigan State University. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/577fc4e2440243084a67dc49/t/579a38e6ebbd1a621986ed6a/1469724904244/Knowledge+and+reasoning+in+mathematical+pedagogy.pdf.