Blatticomposting of Food Waste, Production Estimates, Chemical Composition and CO2 Emissions Savings: A Case Study
-
Published:2023-03-08
Issue:11
Volume:14
Page:3811-3826
-
ISSN:1877-2641
-
Container-title:Waste and Biomass Valorization
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Waste Biomass Valor
Author:
Patón D.ORCID, García-Gómez J. C.
Abstract
AbstractHalf of the organic waste generated by mankind is compostable. Many of the traditional methods of food waste treatment generate pernicious effects on ecosystems, such as leachates, greenhouse gases, pathogenic microorganisms or odors. Three cockroach species that are widespread as live food for feeding exotic animals (mainly reptiles) due to their high growth rates, waste consumption, production and quality of blatticompost: the Madagascar hissing cockroach (Aeluropoda insignis Butler), the Guyana spotted cockroach (Blaptica dubia Serville) and the ivory cockroach (Eublaberus sp.) has been evaluated. Neither the weight–length ratios (W–L) nor the body condition index (Krel) of the three species studied were statistically different between the control and organic waste treatment groups. Average intakes per animal per day were 0.93 g in Aeluropoda, 2.22 g in Blaptica and 2.58 g in Eublaberus. Blatticompost production rates were 0.11, 0.75 and 0.52 g / animal*day, respectively. Taking into account the differences in size and density of individuals, this implies an average waste consumption of 1015.9 g/m2*day, of which 26.7% would be transformed into blatticompost considering the three species together. This is equivalent to 304.8 mt/ha*month of food waste recycled, a blatticompost production of 81.4 mt/ha*month and an estimated greenhouse gas emission savings of 817.2 mt/ha*month. Results indicate that any of the three species studied would be a viable alternative, although the ivory cockroach (Eublaberus sp.) presents ideal characteristics. The massive use of this species in the large-scale treatment of organic waste is proposed. Given the enormous advantages of this treatment and the zero environmental costs (absence of invasive character) could be necessary to adapt the legislation of the European Community to include blatticomposting as a suitable waste treatment as it is done in other parts of the world.
Graphical Abstract
Funder
CEPSA ACERINOX Red Eléctrica de España Diputación de Cádiz Universidad de Extremadura
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Waste Management and Disposal,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Environmental Engineering
Reference56 articles.
1. Kaza, S., Yao, L.C., Bhada-Tata, P., Van Woerden, F.: What a waste 2.0. A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. Urban Development, World Bank, Washington (2018). https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/30317 2. Fowles, T.M., Nansen, C., Närvänen, E., Mesiranta, N., Mattila, M., Heikkinen, A.: Insect-based bioconversion: value from food waste. In: Närvänen, E., Mesiranta, N., Mattila, M., Heikkinen, A. (eds.) Food waste management: solving the wicked problem, pp. 321–346. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20561-4_12. 3. Amicarelli, V., Lagioia, G., Bux, C.: Global warming potential of food waste through the life cycle assessment: an analytical review. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 91, 106677 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106677 4. Kavitha, S., Kannah, R.Y., Kumar, G.,Gunasekaran, M., Banu, J.R.: Introduction: sources and characterization of food waste and food industry wastes. In: Banu, R., Kumar, G., Gunasekaran, M., Kavitha, S. (eds.) Food waste to valuable resources, pp. 1–13. Academic Press, Cambridge (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818353-3.00021-3 5. Poore, J., Nemecek, T.: Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360(6392), 987–992 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|