Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) is a treatment biologically optimizable. The analysis of the microbial balance within the digester allows not only to describe and improve the efficiency of the system but also to foresee potential variations after biochemical interventions. This work aims to highlight methanogenic population variations in two similar parallel digesters to identify bio-indicators for digestion performance after the inclusion of an additive.
Methods
The analysed industrial case study involved the two parallel, pilot-scale, bio-digesters of ACEA Pinerolese Industriale. They had analogous design and fed by the same OFMSW except for an additive inclusion. The analyses by qRT-PCR, on both bio-digesters, have been performed to determine an impact of the additive on the growth and metabolic activity of total methanogens, Methanosarcina spp., Methanocorpuscolum spp., and Methanospirillus spp.
Results
Collected data showed that the addition of biopolymers extracted from compost produced both total methanogens and Methanosarcina decrease (7.67 vs. 7.48 and 6.05 vs. 5.69 Log gene copies/mL sludge respectively, T-test p < 0.01) affecting slightly the methane yield (-8%). Methanosarcina was the highest expressed methanogen; however, the results suggested the involvement of a highly complex and heterogeneous methanogen community.
Conclusions
Total methanogens and active Methanosarcina modulations are able to highlight major bio-methane production even if their shift is slight. Globally only 3–4% of the present and 12–13% of the active methanogens were described. However, biological approach can supply a proxy of production performance of the digester also concerning the feeding peculiarities.
Graphical abstract
Funder
Università degli Studi di Torino
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Waste Management and Disposal,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Environmental Engineering
Reference25 articles.
1. Siebert, S., Gilbert, J., Ricci-Jürgensen, M.: Compost production in Europe (2019)
2. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union: Directives Directive (EU): 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast) (2018). (Text with EEA relevance)
3. Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale: :Rapporto Rifiuti Urbani 2021 ISPRA (2021)
4. Blair, E.M., Dickson, K.L., O’Malley, M.A.: Microbial communities and their enzymes facilitate degradation of recalcitrant polymers in anaerobic digestion. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 64, 100–108 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2021.09.008
5. Amin, F.R., Khalid, H., El-Mashad, H.M., Chen, C., Liu, G., Zhang, R.: Functions of bacteria and archaea participating in the bioconversion of organic waste for methane production. Sci. Total Environ. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143007
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献