Abstract
Abstract
Background
In residential youth care, group care workers and teachers often serve as a mentor for individual adolescents. Although favorable mentoring relationships are associated with positive adolescent outcomes, few studies examined the role of mentoring in residential youth care.
Objective
The present study aims to assess adolescents’, care workers’ and teachers’ mentoring relationship needs in terms of their one-on-one conversations during residential care.
Methods
We conducted structured interviews with eleven adolescents, ten group care workers and two teachers and content analysis to assess the data
Results
All respondents are rather satisfied with their conversations, which are often concerned with how the adolescent is doing. Adolescents mostly consider their family and home-situation as difficult topics, while care workers mostly consider sexuality as a difficult topic to talk about. Although ‘improvement’ with the youth is often the aim, most adolescents report that they do not (know if they) show changes because of these conversations. Moreover, only one of the twelve professionals thinks that it is his core task to achieve behavior change with the adolescents. According to the professionals, conversations often aim at building a good relationship, coaching, determining treatment goals, and gaining insight into the adolescent. Adolescents prefer a mentor who is calm, has respect, listens, and is reluctant in giving advice. Most professionals do not use a specific method and doubt whether they want to have conversations according to a manual or support tool.
Conclusions
Despite being rather satisfied, adolescents and professionals indicate several points for improvement of one-on-one conversations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Life-span and Life-course Studies,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference51 articles.
1. Ahrens, K. R., DuBois, D. L., Richardson, L. P., Fan, M. Y., & Lozano, P. (2008). Youth in foster care with adult mentors during adolescence have improved adult outcomes. Pediatrics, 121(2), e246–e252. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-0508
2. Barth, R. P., Lee, B. R., Lindsey, M. A., Collins, K. S., Strieder, F., Chorpita, B. F., Becker, K. D., & Sparks, J. A. (2012). Evidence-based practice at a crossroads: The timely emergence of common elements and common factors. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731511408440
3. Boeije, H. (2005). Analyseren in kwalitatief onderzoek. Boom Uitgeverij.
4. Boendermaker, L., Van Rooijen, K., Berg, T., & Bartelink, C. (2013). Residentiële jeugdzorg: Wat werkt? [residential youth care: What works?]. Netherlands Youth Institute. Retrieved from http://www.nji.nl/nl/Watwerkt_ResidentileJeugdzorg.pdf
5. Cavell, T. A., Meehan, B. T., Heffer, R. W., & Holladay, J. J. (2002). The natural mentors of adolescent children of alcoholics (COAs): Implications for preventive practices. Journal of Primary Prevention, 23(1), 23–42.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献