Abstract
Abstract
Background
Parent engagement in child-focused interventions is increasingly recognised as an important aspect of effective intervention delivery. While several fields have an emerging literature around parent engagement, no reviews currently exist which combine findings across allied health literatures.
Objective
This review aimed to explore factors relevant to understanding parent engagement in child-focused interventions, as described in qualitative literature across allied health disciplines, toward informing the clinical practice of helping professionals in effectively engaging parents.
Methods
A systematised qualitative literature review was carried out, with a comprehensive search of five online databases (CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus) for allied health literature (specifically: behaviour analysis, occupational therapy, psychology, and speech-language therapy) using parent engagement key words. Reference searching and citation tracking steps supported the search. Thematic synthesis was used as the overarching framework and analysis approach.
Results
8824 unique studies were generated in the search. Of the 71 studies which met inclusion criteria, 38 reported qualitative findings and were included in the analysis. Five themes were identified including: societal context, interpersonal context, clinician features, family features, and relationship as engagement.
Conclusions
Findings support conceptual explanations of parent engagement as a complex and dynamic process, emphasising the joint contributions of parents and clinicians in developing therapeutic relationships which promote engagement. Across allied health research there are consistency of understandings around parent engagement, supporting the conclusion that clinicians can look to literatures from various helping fields to inform clinical practice around engaging parents in interventions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. *References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the review.
2. *Anderson, K., Balandin, S., & Stancliffe, R. (2014). Australian parents’ experiences of speech generating device (SGD) service delivery. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2013.857735
3. Booth, A. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage
4. *Botterill, S., Cottam, S., Fowke, A., & Theodore, K. (2019). It put control back onto my family situation: Family experiences of positive behaviour support. Advances in Mental Health & Intellectual Disabilities, 13(3/4), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/AMHID-11-2018-0049
5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献