Experimenting with every American king

Author:

Mankowitz PoppyORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe standard contemporary semantics for ‘every’ predict the truth of occurrences of sentences with restrictors that denote the empty set, such as ‘Every American king lives in New York’. The literature on empty restrictors has been concerned with explaining a particular violation of this prediction: many assessors consider empty-restrictor sentences to be odd rather than valued, and they are apparently more likely to do so when such sentences include determiners like ‘every’ as opposed to those like ‘no’. Empirical investigation of this issue is overdue, and I present the results of three experimental surveys. The first unexpected outcome is that there is no evidence of a contrast in assessors’ tendencies to judge sentences to be odd based on determiner type. An additional surprising result is that those assessors who assign a truth value to sentences where ‘every’ combines with an empty restrictor overwhelmingly assign the value false. The full results do not fit straightforwardly with any existing account.

Funder

European Research Council Starting Grant

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Philosophy

Reference55 articles.

1. Abrusán, Márta, and Kriszta Szendrői. 2013. Experimenting with the king of France: Topics, verifiability and definite descriptions. Semantics and Pragmatics 6(1): 1–43.

2. Abusch, Dorit, and Mats Rooth. 2003. Empty-domain effects for presuppositional and nonpresuppositional determiners. In Context-dependence in the analysis of linguistic meaning, eds. Hans Kamp and Barbara Partee, 7–27. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

3. Arroyo, Francisco Valle. 1982. Negatives in context. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21(1): 118–126.

4. Barwise, Jon, and Robin Cooper. 1981. Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4(2): 159–219.

5. Bott, Oliver, Fabian Schlotterbeck, and Udo Klein. 2019. Empty-set effects in quantifier interpretation. Journal of Semantics 36(1): 99–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffy015.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3