1. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114. doi:
10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80
.
2. Aubry, S., Ruble, D. N., & Silverman, L. B. (1999). The role of gender knowledge in children’s gender-typed preferences. In L. Balter, C. S. Tamis-LeMonda, L. Balter, & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 363–390). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
3. Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196–205. doi:
10.1037/0022-006X.45.2.196
.
4. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. doi:
10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354
.
5. Bigler, R. S. (2006, April). The appropriateness or desirability of gender differentiation. Paper presented at the Gender Development Research Conference, San Francisco, CA.