Abstract
AbstractBiology seems to present local and transitory regularities rather than immutable laws. To account for these historically constituted regularities and to distinguish them from mathematical invariants, Montévil and Mossio (Journal of Theoretical Biology 372:179–191, 2015) have proposed to speak of constraints. In this article we analyse the causal power of these constraints in the evolution of biodiversity, i.e., their positivity, but also the modality of their action on the directions taken by evolution. We argue that to fully account for the causal power of these constraints on evolution, they must be thought of in terms of normativity. In this way, we want to highlight two characteristics of the evolutionary constraints. The first, already emphasised as reported by Gould (The structure of evolutionary theory, Harvard University Press, 2002), is that these constraints are both produced by and producing biological evolution and that this circular causation creates true novelties. The second is that this specific causality, which generates unpredictability in evolution, stems not only from the historicity of biological constraints, but also from their internalisation through the practices of living beings.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),History
Reference49 articles.
1. Aristotle (2009). Prior analytics. Translated by G. Striker. Oxford University Press.
2. Aristotle (2017). On interpretation. Translated by E. M. Edghill. Oxford University Press.
3. Bailly, F., & Longo, G. (2009). Biological organization and anti-entropy. Journal of Biological Systems, 17(1), 63–96.
4. Brooks, D. R., & Wiley, E. O. (1988). Evolution as entropy. Toward a unified theory of biology. University of Chicago Press.
5. Canguilhem, G. (1966). Le normal et le pathologique. Presses Universitaires de France.