Abstract
AbstractThe article takes the renewed popularity and interest in epidemiological modelling for Covid-19 as a point of departure to ask how modelling has historically shaped epidemiological reasoning. The focus lies on a particular model, developed in the late 1920s through a collaboration of the former field-epidemiologists and medical officer, Wade Hampton Frost, and the biostatistician and population ecologist Lowell Reed. Other than former approaches to epidemic theory in mathematical formula, the Reed-Frost epidemic theory was materialised in a simple mechanical analogue: a box with coloured marbles and a wooden trough. The article reconstructs how the introduction of this mechanical model has reshaped epidemiological reasoning by shifting the field from purely descriptive to analytical practices. It was not incidental that the history of this model coincided with the foundation of epidemiology as an academic discipline, as it valorised and institutionalised new theoretical contributions to the field. Through its versatility, the model shifted the field’s focus from mono-causal explanations informed by bacteriology, eugenics or sanitary perspectives towards the systematic consideration of epidemics as a set of interdependent and dynamic variables.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),History
Reference52 articles.
1. Abbey, H. (1952). An examination of the reed-frost theory of epidemics. Human Biology, 24(3), 201–233.
2. Amsterdamska, O. (2001). Standardizing epidemics: Infection, INheritance, and environment in prewar experimental epidemiology. In J.-P. Gaudilliére & I. Löwy (Eds.), Heredity and infection: The history of disease transmission (pp. 135–180). Routledge.
3. Amsterdamska, O. (2005). Demarcating epidemiology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(1), 17–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904270719
4. Bauer, S. (2013). Modeling population health. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 27(4), 510–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12054
5. Benjamin, W. (1969). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Ahrendt (Ed.), Illuminations (p. 26). Schocken.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献