A box, a trough and marbles: How the Reed-Frost epidemic theory shaped epidemiological reasoning in the 20th century

Author:

Engelmann LukasORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe article takes the renewed popularity and interest in epidemiological modelling for Covid-19 as a point of departure to ask how modelling has historically shaped epidemiological reasoning. The focus lies on a particular model, developed in the late 1920s through a collaboration of the former field-epidemiologists and medical officer, Wade Hampton Frost, and the biostatistician and population ecologist Lowell Reed. Other than former approaches to epidemic theory in mathematical formula, the Reed-Frost epidemic theory was materialised in a simple mechanical analogue: a box with coloured marbles and a wooden trough. The article reconstructs how the introduction of this mechanical model has reshaped epidemiological reasoning by shifting the field from purely descriptive to analytical practices. It was not incidental that the history of this model coincided with the foundation of epidemiology as an academic discipline, as it valorised and institutionalised new theoretical contributions to the field. Through its versatility, the model shifted the field’s focus from mono-causal explanations informed by bacteriology, eugenics or sanitary perspectives towards the systematic consideration of epidemics as a set of interdependent and dynamic variables.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),History

Reference52 articles.

1. Abbey, H. (1952). An examination of the reed-frost theory of epidemics. Human Biology, 24(3), 201–233.

2. Amsterdamska, O. (2001). Standardizing epidemics: Infection, INheritance, and environment in prewar experimental epidemiology. In J.-P. Gaudilliére & I. Löwy (Eds.), Heredity and infection: The history of disease transmission (pp. 135–180). Routledge.

3. Amsterdamska, O. (2005). Demarcating epidemiology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(1), 17–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904270719

4. Bauer, S. (2013). Modeling population health. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 27(4), 510–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12054

5. Benjamin, W. (1969). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Ahrendt (Ed.), Illuminations (p. 26). Schocken.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3