Abstract
AbstractThis article argues that the movement of dogs from pounds to medical laboratories played a critically important role in debates over the use of animals in science and medicine in the United States in the twentieth century, not least by drawing the scientific community into every greater engagement with bureaucratic political governance. If we are to understand the unique characteristics of the American federal legislation that emerges in the 1960s, we need to understand the long and protracted debate over the use of pound animals at the local municipal and state level between antivivisectionists, humane activists, and scientific and medical researchers. We argue that the Laboratory Animal Care Act of 1966 reflects the slow evolution of a strategy that proved most successful in local conflicts, and which would characterize a “new humanitarianism”: not the regulation of experimental practices but of the care and transportation of the animals being provided to the laboratory. Our analysis is consistent with, and draws upon, scholarship which has established the productive power of public agencies and civil society on the periphery of the American state.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),History
Reference93 articles.
1. Anon. (1921). The work in California. The Starry Cross, 30, 75–6.
2. Anon. (1938c). California’s “humane pound law” and medical research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 110, 582–583.
3. Anon. (1938g). President sproul urges the defeat of pound bill at election. California and Western Medicine, 49, 408.
4. Anon. (1947). Referendum in the humane associations. Our challenge to the ‘big four’ of the humane organisations who consorted with vivisectors. Our Animal Friends, 1(5), 5–7.
5. Anon. (1948). Medical news. Journal of the American Medical Association, 137, 709.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献