Abstract
AbstractAre psychiatric disorders natural kinds? This question has received a lot of attention within present-day philosophy of psychiatry, where many authors debate the ontology and nature of mental disorders. Similarly, historians of psychiatry, dating back to Foucault, have debated whether psychiatric researchers conceived of mental disorders as natural kinds or not. However, historians of psychiatry have paid little to no attention to the influence of (a) theories within logic, and (b) theories within metaphysics on psychiatric accounts of proper method, and on accounts of the nature and classification of mental disorders. Historically, however, logic and metaphysics have extensively shaped methods and interpretations of classifications in the natural sciences. This paper corrects this lacuna in the history of psychiatry, and demonstrates that theories within logic and metaphysics, articulated by Christian Wolff (1679–1754), have significantly shaped the conception of medical method and (psychiatric) nosology of the influential nosologist Boissier De Sauvages (1706–1767). After treating Sauvages, I discuss the method of the influential nosologist William Cullen (1710–1790), and demonstrate the continuity between the classificatory methods of Sauvages and Cullen. I show that both Sauvages and Cullen were essentialists concerning medical diseases in general and psychiatric disorders in particular, contributing to the history of conceptions of the ontology and nature of mental disorders.
Funder
The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),History
Reference51 articles.
1. Adriaens, P. R., & De Block, A. (2013). Why we essentialize mental disorders. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38, 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jht008
2. Barfoot, M. (1993). Philosophy and method in Cullen’s medical teaching. In A. Doig, J. P. S. Ferguson, I. A. Milne, & R. Passmore (Eds.), William Cullen and the eighteenth century medical world (pp. 110–132). Edinburgh University Press.
3. Baumgarten, A.G. (1766). Metaphysik. Translated by G.F. Meier. Hemmerde.
4. Beatty, H.R. (2016). Nervous disease in late eighteenth-century Britain: The reality of a fashionable disorder. Routledge.
5. Bell, W.J. (1950). Some American students of “that shining oracle of physic” Dr. William Cullen of Edinburgh, 1755–1766. Proceedings of the American philosophical society, 94, 275–281. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3143563.