Genetics without genes? The centrality of genetic markers in livestock genetics and genomics

Author:

Lowe James W. E.ORCID,Bruce Ann

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, rather than focusing on genes as an organising concept around which historical considerations of theory and practice in genetics are elucidated, we place genetic markers at the heart of our analysis. This reflects their central role in the subject of our account, livestock genetics concerning the domesticated pig,Sus scrofa. We define a genetic marker as a (usually material) element existing in different forms in the genome, that can be identified and mapped using a variety (and often combination) of quantitative, classical and molecular genetic techniques. The conjugation of pig genome researchers around the common object of the marker from the early-1990s allowed the distinctive theories and approaches of quantitative and molecular genetics concerning the size and distribution of gene effects to align (but never fully integrate) in projects to populate genome maps. Critical to this was the nature of markers as ontologically inert, internally heterogeneous and relational. Though genes as an organising and categorising principle remained important, the particular concatenation of limitations, opportunities, and intended research goals of the pig genetics community, meant that a progressively stronger focus on the identification and mapping of markers rather than genes per se became a hallmark of the community. We therefore detail a different way of doing genetics to more gene-centred accounts. By doing so, we reveal the presence of practices, concepts and communities that would otherwise be hidden.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),History

Reference79 articles.

1. Alderson, G. L. H., & Plastow, G. S. (2004). Use of DNA markers to assist with product traceability and pedigree analysis and their role in breed conservation. Animal Genetic Resources, 35, 1–7.

2. Archibald, A. L. (1986). A molecular genetic approach to the porcine stress syndrome. In P. V. Tarrant, G. Eikelenboom, & G. Moni (Eds.), Evaluation and control of meat quality in pigs (pp. 343–357). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

3. Archibald, A. L. (1998). Comparative genome mapping—the livestock perspective. In A. J. Clark (Ed.), Animal breeding: Technology for the 21st century (pp. 137–164). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

4. Archibald, A. L., Haley, C. S., Brown, J. F., Couperwhite, S., McQueen, H. A., Nicholson, D., et al. (1995). The PiGMaP consortium linkage map of the pig (Sus scrofa). Mammalian Genome, 6, 157–175.

5. Archibald, A. L., & Imlah, P. (1985). The halothane sensitivity locus and its linkage relationships. Animal Blood Groups and Biochemical Genetics (Special Issue), 4, 253–335.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Postgenomic Subject Matter;Intangible Intangibles;2024-04-30

2. The big challenge for livestock genomics is to make sequence data pay;Peer Community Journal;2023-08-02

3. Genomics in animal breeding from the perspectives of matrices and molecules;Hereditas;2023-05-06

4. Improving and Going Beyond Reference Genomes;A History of Genomics across Species, Communities and Projects;2023

5. The Pig Community and Their Reference Genome;A History of Genomics across Species, Communities and Projects;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3