Abstract
AbstractIn the middle of the twentieth century, physiologists interested in human biological rhythms undertook a series of field experiments in natural spaces that they believed could closely approximate conditions of biological timelessness. With the field of rhythms research was still largely on the fringes of the life sciences, natural spaces seemed to offer unique research opportunities beyond what was available to physiologists in laboratory spaces. In particular, subterranean caves and the High Arctic became archetypal ‘natural laboratories’ for the study of human circadian (daily) rhythms. This paper is explores the field experiments which occurred in these ‘timeless spaces’. It considers how scientists understood these natural spaces as suitably ‘timeless’ for studying circadian rhythms and what their experimental practices can tell us about contemporary physiological notions of biological time, especially its relationship to ‘environmentality’ (Formosinho et al. in Stud History Philos Sci 91:148–158, 2022). In so doing, this paper adds to a growing literature on the interrelationship of field sites by demonstrating the ways that caves and the Arctic were connected by rhythms scientists. Finally, it will explore how the use of these particular spaces were not just scientific but also political – leveraging growing Cold War anxieties about nuclear fallout and the space race to bring greater prestige and funding to the study of circadian rhythms in its early years.
Funder
Novo Nordisk Fonden
Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research
Royal Library, Copenhagen University Library
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),History
Reference95 articles.
1. Allbutt, T. C. (1870). Medical thermometry. British and Foreign Medico-Chirurgical Review, 45(90), 429–441.
2. American Weekly. (1939). Need we sleep away 1/3 of our lives? (April 2, 1939). Nathaniel Kleitman Papers (Box 53) Hanna Holborn Gray Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
3. Aschoff, J. (1960). Exogenous and endogenous components in circadian rhythms. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 25, 11–28.
4. Bigg, C., Aubin, D., & Felsch, P. (2009). Introduction: The laboratory of nature – science in the mountains. Science in Context, 22(2), 311–321.
5. Bünning, E. (1960). Opening address: Biological clocks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium in Quantitative Biology, Biological Clocks, 25, 1–9.