Abstract
AbstractAssistive reproductive technologies are increasingly used to control the biology of fertility and its temporality. Combining historical, theoretical, and socio-empirical insights, this paper aims at expanding our understanding of the way temporality emerges and is negotiated in the contemporary practice of cryopreservation of reproductive materials. We first present an historical overview of the practice of cryo-fertility to indicate the co-production of technology and social constructions of temporality. We then apply a theoretical framework for analysing cryobiology and cryopreservation technologies as creating a new epistemic perspective interconnecting biology and temporality. Thereafter, we focus on the case of ‘social egg freezing’ (SEF) to present socio-empirical findings illustrating different reproductive temporalities and their connection to the social acceptance of and expectations towards the practice. SEF is a particularly interesting case as it aims to enable women to disconnect their reproductive potential from their biological rhythms. Based on 39 open interviews with Israeli and German SEF users, the cross-cultural comparative findings reveal three types of attitudes: postponing motherhood/reproductive decisions (German users); singlehood and “waiting” for a partner (Israeli and German users); and the planning of and hope for multiple children (Israeli users). For theory building, this analysis uncovers temporality formations embedded in gender and reproductive moral values; including the ‘extended present’, ‘waiting’, and ‘reproductive futurism’. We conclude by discussing the contribution of our findings by advancing the theoretical framework of ‘cryopolitics’ highlighting the theoretical implications and importance of gendered and cultural imaginaries (re)constructing medical technological innovations and related temporalities.
Funder
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Minerva Foundation
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),History
Reference94 articles.
1. Adam, M. (2020). I do not have Corona- but I do have symptoms. Israel HaYom. Retrieved August 23, 2021, from https://www.israelhayom.co.il/article/743723
2. Adams, V., Murphy, M., & Clarke, A. E. (2009). Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity, 28, 246–265. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2009.18
3. Amir, M. (2006). Bio-temporality and social regulation: The emergence of the biological clock. Polygraph: an International Journal of Culture and Politics, 18, 47–72.
4. ASRM (Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine). (2018). Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: An Ethics Committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 110(6), 1022–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.027
5. ASRM (the Practice Committees of American Society for Reproductive Medicine) & SART (the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology). (2013). Mature oocyte cryopreservation: A guideline. Fertility and Sterility, 99, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.028
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献