A systematic review of artificial intelligence impact assessments

Author:

Stahl Bernd CarstenORCID,Antoniou Josephina,Bhalla Nitika,Brooks Laurence,Jansen Philip,Lindqvist Blerta,Kirichenko Alexey,Marchal Samuel,Rodrigues Rowena,Santiago Nicole,Warso Zuzanna,Wright David

Abstract

AbstractArtificial intelligence (AI) is producing highly beneficial impacts in many domains, from transport to healthcare, from energy distribution to marketing, but it also raises concerns about undesirable ethical and social consequences. AI impact assessments (AI-IAs) are a way of identifying positive and negative impacts early on to safeguard AI’s benefits and avoid its downsides. This article describes the first systematic review of these AI-IAs. Working with a population of 181 documents, the authors identified 38 actual AI-IAs and subjected them to a rigorous qualitative analysis with regard to their purpose, scope, organisational context, expected issues, timeframe, process and methods, transparency and challenges. The review demonstrates some convergence between AI-IAs. It also shows that the field is not yet at the point of full agreement on content, structure and implementation. The article suggests that AI-IAs are best understood as means to stimulate reflection and discussion concerning the social and ethical consequences of AI ecosystems. Based on the analysis of existing AI-IAs, the authors describe a baseline process of implementing AI-IAs that can be implemented by AI developers and vendors and that can be used as a critical yardstick by regulators and external observers to evaluate organisations’ approaches to AI.

Funder

H2020 Science with and for Society

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference119 articles.

1. Access Now (2018) Human rights in the age of artificial intelligence. Access Now

2. Access Now Policy Team (2018) The Toronto declaration: protecting the right to equality and non-discrimination in machine learning systems. Access Now Policy Team, Toronto

3. Ada Lovelace Institute (2020) Examining tools for assessing algorithmic systems the Black Box. Ada Lovelace Institute, London

4. Ada Lovelace Institute (2022) Algorithmic impact assessment: a case study in healthcare. Ada Lovelace Institute, London

5. Adner R (2006) Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harv Bus Rev 84:98–107

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3