Consumer-side fairness in recommender systems: a systematic survey of methods and evaluation

Author:

Vassøy Bjørnar,Langseth Helge

Abstract

AbstractIn the current landscape of ever-increasing levels of digitalization, we are facing major challenges pertaining to data volume. Recommender systems have become irreplaceable both for helping users navigate the increasing amounts of data and, conversely, aiding providers in marketing products to interested users. Data-driven models are susceptible to data bias, materializing in the bias influencing the models’ decision-making. For recommender systems, such issues are well exemplified by occupation recommendation, where biases in historical data may lead to recommender systems relating one gender to lower wages or to the propagation of stereotypes. In particular, consumer-side fairness, which focuses on mitigating discrimination experienced by users of recommender systems, has seen a vast number of diverse approaches. The approaches are further diversified through differing ideas on what constitutes fair and, conversely, discriminatory recommendations. This survey serves as a systematic overview and discussion of the current research on consumer-side fairness in recommender systems. To that end, a novel taxonomy based on high-level fairness definitions is proposed and used to categorize the research and the proposed fairness evaluation metrics. Finally, we highlight some suggestions for the future direction of the field.

Funder

SFI NorwAI

NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference122 articles.

1. Afsar MM, Crump T, Far B (2022) Reinforcement learning based recommender systems: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 55(7):1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543846

2. Ashokan A, Haas C (2021) Fairness metrics and bias mitigation strategies for rating predictions. Inf Process Manag 58(5):102646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102646

3. Bach SH, Broecheler M, Huang B et al (2017) Hinge-loss markov random fields and probabilistic soft logic. J Mach Learn Res 18(1):3846–3912

4. Bhattacharyya A (1943) On a measure of divergence between two statistical populations defined by their probability distributions. Bull Calcutta Math Soc 35:99–109

5. Biswas A, Patro GK, Ganguly N et al (2021) Toward fair recommendation in two-sided platforms. ACM Trans Web 16(2):1–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3503624

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3