Abstract
AbstractOur paper presents a novel approach to pattern classification. The general disadvantage of a traditional classifier is in too different behaviour and optimal parameter settings during training on a given pattern set and the following cross-validation. We describe the term critical sensitivity, which means the lowest reached sensitivity for an individual class. This approach ensures a uniform classification quality for individual class classification. Therefore, it prevents outlier classes with terrible results. We focus on the evaluation of critical sensitivity, as a quality criterion. Our proposed classifier eliminates this disadvantage in many cases. Our aim is to present that easily formed hidden classes can significantly contribute to improving the quality of a classifier. Therefore, we decided to propose classifier will have a relatively simple structure. The proposed classifier structure consists of three layers. The first is linear, used for dimensionality reduction. The second layer serves for clustering and forms hidden classes. The third one is the output layer for optimal cluster unioning. For verification of the proposed system results, we use standard datasets. Cross-validation performed on standard datasets showed that our critical sensitivity-based classifier provides comparable sensitivity to reference classifiers.
Funder
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
RCfI
Czech Technical University in Prague
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference58 articles.
1. Abdar M, Zomorodi-Moghadam M, Das R, Ting IH (2017) Performance analysis of classification algorithms on early detection of liver disease. Exp Syst Appl 67:239–251
2. Antony N, Deshpande A (2016) Domain-driven density based clustering algorithm. Proceedings of international conference on ICT for sustainable development. Springer, pp 705–714
3. Asafuddoula M, Verma B, Zhang M (2017) An incremental ensemble classifier learning by means of a rule-based accuracy and diversity comparison. International joint conference on neural networks. IEEE, pp 1924–1931
4. Aslan MF, Celik Y, Sabanci K, Durdu A (2018) Breast cancer diagnosis by different machine learning methods using blood analysis data. Int J Intell Syst Appl Eng 6(4):289–293
5. Austria YD, Lalata JAP, Maria LB Jr, Goh JEE, Goh MLI, Vicente HN (2019) Comparison of machine learning algorithms in breast cancer prediction using the coimbra dataset. Int J Simul Syst Sci Technol 20:23