CHIRPS: Explaining random forest classification

Author:

Hatwell Julian,Gaber Mohamed Medhat,Azad R. Muhammad Atif

Abstract

Abstract Modern machine learning methods typically produce “black box” models that are opaque to interpretation. Yet, their demand has been increasing in the Human-in-the-Loop processes, that is, those processes that require a human agent to verify, approve or reason about the automated decisions before they can be applied. To facilitate this interpretation, we propose Collection of High Importance Random Path Snippets (CHIRPS); a novel algorithm for explaining random forest classification per data instance. CHIRPS extracts a decision path from each tree in the forest that contributes to the majority classification, and then uses frequent pattern mining to identify the most commonly occurring split conditions. Then a simple, conjunctive form rule is constructed where the antecedent terms are derived from the attributes that had the most influence on the classification. This rule is returned alongside estimates of the rule’s precision and coverage on the training data along with counter-factual details. An experimental study involving nine data sets shows that classification rules returned by CHIRPS have a precision at least as high as the state of the art when evaluated on unseen data (0.91–0.99) and offer a much greater coverage (0.04–0.54). Furthermore, CHIRPS uniquely controls against under- and over-fitting solutions by maximising novel objective functions that are better suited to the local (per instance) explanation setting.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference69 articles.

1. Adnan MN, Islam MZ (2017) ForEx++: a new framework for knowledge discovery from decision forests. Australas J Inf Syst 21

2. Agrawal R, Srikant R et al (1994) Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In: Proceedings of 20th internatinal conference very large data bases, VLDB, vol 1215, pp 487–99

3. Andrews R, Diederich J, Tickle AB (1995) Survey and critique of techniques for extracting rules from trained artificial neural networks. Knowl-Based Syst 8(6):373–389

4. Biau G (2012) Analysis of a random forests model. J Mach Learn Res 13:1063–1095

5. Bibal A, Frenay B (2016) Interpretability of machine learning models and representations: an introduction. In: Michel V (ed) ESANN, computational intelligence and machine learning. Bruges, Belgium, pp 77–82

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3