Opportunities and barriers for prehospital emergency medical services research in the Netherlands; results of a mixed-methods consensus study

Author:

Vianen Niek J.,Maissan Iscander M.,den Hartog Dennis,Stolker Robert J.,Houmes Robert J.,Gommers Diederik A. M. P. J.,Van Meeteren Nico L. U.,Hoeks Sanne E.,Van Lieshout Esther M. M.,Verhofstad Michael H. J.,Van Vledder Mark G.ORCID,Alsma Jelmer,Baden David N.,Bevelander Timo,Bierens Joost,Bollen Jan,Bosch Jan,Dercksen Bert,Duvekot Johannes J.,Gaakeer Menno I.,van Geffen Geert-Jan,Geurts Dorien H. F.,van Grunsven Pierre M.,van Heijl Mark,van ’t Hof Arnoud,Hollmann Markus W.,Hoogerwerf Nico,Huig Isabelle C.,Kooij Fabian,de Leeuw Marcel A.,van der Marel Caroline D.,Morsink Marlies,Noordergraaf Gerrit J.,van de Pas Harm,Peters Joost H.,Poeze Martijn,Richelle Paul,Roozenbeek Bob,Schober Patrick,Schoonhoven Lisette,van Schuppen Hans,Siegers Arjen,Tibboel Dick,Tolsma Rudolf T.,Turner Nigel M.,de Visser Matthijs,Vloet Lilian C. M.,de Vos Ronald,van Wageningen Bas,van der Weerd Angelique,

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionQuality improvement in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) can only be achieved by high-quality research and critical appraisal of current practices. This study examines current opportunities and barriers in EMS research in the Netherlands.MethodsThis mixed-methods consensus study consisted of three phases. The first phase consisted of semi-structured interviews with relevant stakeholders. Thematic analysis of qualitative data derived from these interviews was used to identify main themes, which were subsequently discussed in several online focus groups in the second phase. Output from these discussions was used to shape statements for an online Delphi consensus study among relevant stakeholders in EMS research. Consensus was met if 80% of respondents agreed or disagreed on a particular statement.ResultsForty-nine stakeholders participated in the study; qualitative thematic analysis of the interviews and focus group discussions identified four main themes: (1) data registration and data sharing, (2) laws and regulations, (3) financial aspects and funding, and (4) organization and culture. Qualitative data from the first two phases of the study were used to construct 33 statements for an online Delphi study. Consensus was reached on 21 (64%) statements. Eleven (52%) of these statements pertained to the storage and use of EMS patient data.ConclusionBarriers for prehospital EMS research in the Netherlands include issues regarding the use of patient data, privacy and legislation, funding and research culture in EMS organizations. Opportunities to increase scientific productivity in EMS research include the development of a national strategy for EMS data and the incorporation of EMS topics in research agendas of national medical professional associations.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Emergency Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3