Abstract
AbstractThis article interrogates twelve step practice within Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) from the perspective of Foucault’s later work on governance, truth-telling and subjectivity. Recent critical studies of addiction tend to view self-help cultures like that of AA and related twelve step programs as integral parts of contemporary power/knowledge complexes, and thus as agents of the modern “will to knowledge” that Foucault often engages with. In line with the widespread Foucauldian critique of governmentality, addiction self-help culture is thus conceived as one that primarily reproduces abstract, neoliberal norms on health and subjectivity. The argument put forward in this article aims to upset this framework attending to a number of features of twelve step practice that, arguably, bear striking resemblances to Foucault’s later discussions of ethics, care of self and truth-telling. In this, it is suggested that a close study of AA practices, might interrupt assumptions about contemporary addiction discourse and its relationship to issues of truth and power often reproduced in Foucauldian critiques.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science
Reference38 articles.
1. Anonymous, A. (2018). AA Fact file. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services Inc.
2. Anonymous, A. (2001). The Big book of Alcoholic Anonymous: How thousands of men and women have recovered from alcoholism. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services Inc.
3. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Bech Dyrberg, T. (2016). Foucault on parrhesia: The autonomy of politics and democracy. Political Theory, 44(2), 265–288.
5. Bufe, C. (1998). Alcoholic Anonymous: Cult or cure? Tucson: Sharp Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献