Abstract
AbstractIn the present paper, I intend to systematically revisit Thomas Luckmann’s account of the relation between phenomenology and sociology and to assess its strengths and weaknesses in terms of constructive criticism. In order to achieve this aim, I will proceed in three steps. First (1), I will reconstruct the Luckmannian approach by means of an exhaustive analysis of his programmatic texts. Second (2), I will identify its strengths and merits. And finally (3), I will discuss its shortcomings and try to correct them in two ways, namely, by bringing Luckmann into a dialogue with other sociological-theoretical and phenomenological accounts, and by counteracting some of his problematic claims with alternative insights contained in his own work.
Funder
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science
Reference86 articles.
1. Belvedere, C. (2011). Problemas de fenomenología social: A propósito de Alfred Schutz, las ciencias sociales y las cosas mismas. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
2. Belvedere, C. (2013). Presentación: historia, desarrollo y actualidad de la sociología fenomenológica. Revista Sociedad, 32, 5–11.
3. Belvedere, C. (2020). Ethnomethodology as an experimentation with the natural attitude: George Psathas on phenomenological sociology. Human Studies, 43(1), 353–360.
4. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
5. Bird, G. (2009). What is phenomenological sociology again? Human Studies, 32(4), 419–439.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献