Abstract
AbstractThis article compares Weber’s notion of Verstehende Soziologie with Znaniecki’s concepts of humanistic coefficient and cultural sociology. While both authors follow an interpretive perspective and agree that the specific object of sociological inquiry is social action, they diverge in their conceptions of social action and in their definition of sociology and its methods and aims. For, in contrast to Znaniecki, Weber holds that sociology aims not only to understand social action, but also to explain it. Social action, moreover, is differently defined according to whether it is oriented to the conduct of others, as with Weber, or aims to exert influence on others, as with Znaniecki. As for their respective methods of inquiry, Znaniecki proposes to reconstruct the actor’s experiences and viewpoints, while Weber advocates the formulation of generic ideal types for the purposes of describing and explaining social and historical courses of events. Finally, the study of the social order belongs to the cultural sciences, according to Znaniecki. For Weber, the social order is sociological, and follows from the prevalence of consensual action in particular communities such as the market or language communities. Otherwise, its prevalence should not be taken for granted.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference62 articles.
1. Abel, T. (1929). Systematic sociology in Germany. Columbia University Press.
2. Alexander, J. (1983). The classical attempt at theoretical synthesis: Max Weber. Routledge.
3. Bierstedt, R. (1969). Florian Znaniecki on humanistic sociology. The University of Chicago Press.
4. Bruun, H. H. (2007). Science, values and politics in Max Weber’s methodology. Ashgate.
5. Bulmer, M. (1984). The Chicago school of sociology. The University of Chicago Press.