Abstract
AbstractIn this paper, I focus on the concept of embeddedness as the background against which eros is a force and a power in and through interactions. To go beyond an internalist account of eros, I engage in a dialogue with some philosophical accounts of desire from an enactive perspective.This enables me to shed light on the location of the embodied tension as “in-between” lovers and “all-around” them. Crucial to this tensional account of embedded eros is the intertwining between self and others’ becomings in processes of participatory sense-making. Through participatory sense-making lovers make their worlds, creating new ways of being and knowing in the ensemble. I advance some steps towards an enactive ethics of eros where, I claim, the cultivation of the space in-between and all-around lovers is the key to avoid the traps of a degenerated form of eros.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference62 articles.
1. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
2. Belfiore, E. S. (2012). Socrates’ daimonic art: Love for wisdom in four Platonic dialogues. Cambridge University Press.
3. Berlant, L. (1998). Intimacy: A special issue. Critical Inquiry, 24(1).
4. Burnyeat, M. (1992). Socratic midwifery, Platonic inspiration. In H. Benson (Ed.), Essays on the philosophy of Socrates (pp. 53–65). Oxford: University Press.
5. Candiotto, L. (2015). Plato’s cosmological medicine in the discourse of Eryximachus in the Symposium. The responsibility of a harmonic techne. Plato Journal, 5, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_15_5
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The problem of sentience;Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences;2024-06-07