Postphenomenological Method and Technological Things Themselves

Author:

Ritter MartinORCID

Abstract

AbstractWe live in a world where it is impossible to exist without, and beyond, technologies. Despite this omnipresence, we tend to overlook their influence on us. The vigorously developing approach of postphenomenology, combining insights from phenomenology and pragmatism, focuses on the so-called technological mediation, i.e., on how technologies as mediators of human-world relations influence the appearing of both the world and the human beings in it. My analysis aims at demonstrating both the methodological weaknesses and open possibilities of postphenomenology. After summarizing its essentials, I will scrutinize, first, its ability to turn to the technological things themselves and, second, the so-called empirical turn as realized by postphenomenology. By assessing its conceptual framework from the phenomenological perspective, I hope to demonstrate that postphenomenology needs philosophical clarification and strengthening. In short, it needs a more phenomenological, and less pragmatic, approach to technology in its influence on human experience.

Funder

Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science

Reference27 articles.

1. Aagaard, B. F., Sorensen, T., & Hasse, (Eds.). (2018). Postphenomenological methodologies: New ways in mediating techno-human relations. Lexington Books.

2. Achterhuis, H. (Ed.). (2001). American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn (trans: Crease, R.P.). Indiana University Press.

3. Coeckelbergh, M. (2021). Earth, technology, language: A contribution to holistic and transcendental revisions after the artifactual turn. Foundations of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09730-9

4. Gendlin, E. T. (2017). Two phenomenologists do not disagree. In E. T. Gendlin (Ed.), Saying what we mean: Implicit precision and the responsive order (pp. 5–21). Northwestern University Press.

5. Harman, G. (2002). Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Open Court.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3