Abstract
AbstractThe main aim of this study is to analyse household consumption patterns in the highest and lowest income quintiles and explore how they have changed over time and generations. Thus, the article explores whether social inclusivity through consumption has truly increased. This study utilises the cross-sectional time-series data of the Finnish Household Expenditure Surveys (HESs), covering the period 1966–2016. We use the Age-Period-Cohort Gap/Oaxaca (APCGO) model with logitrank dependent variables as the main statistical method. Our results indicate that an overall high income is advantageous with respect to income and spending, though the gap between high- and low-income groups has remained stagnant over cohorts. A more in-depth analysis reveals that the expenditure gap, in terms of necessities, food, and groceries consumption, has narrowed. Instead, income elastic-oriented spending on culture and leisure time has significantly increased in the high-income group, where the expenditure gap has expanded 60 percentage points over the cohorts. Simply put, expenditures on necessities have become more inclusive, but low-income groups are increasingly more ‘leisure-poor’. Overall, high-income classes are spending an increasing amount of money on culture and leisure time over cohorts.
Funder
Strategic Research Council
University of Turku (UTU) including Turku University Central Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Social Psychology
Reference102 articles.
1. Aguiar, M., & Bils, M. (2015). Has consumption inequality mirrored income inequality? American Economic Review, 105(9), 2725. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20120599
2. Attanasio, O., Hurst, E., & Pistaferri, L. (2014). The evolution of income, consumption, and leisure inequality in the United States, 1980–2010. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17982
3. Attanasio, O. P., & Browning, M. (1993). Consumption over the life cycle and over the business cycle (Working Paper No 4453). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4453
4. Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Kearney, M. S. (2005). Trends in US wage inequality: Re-assessing the revisionists (Working Paper No. 11627). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w11627
5. Bar-Haim, E., Chauvel, L., Gornick, J., & Hartung, A. (2018). The persistence of the gender earnings gap: Cohort trends and the role of education in twelve countries (No. 737; LIS Working Papers). LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lis/liswps/737.html
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献