Abstract
AbstractThe optimal combination of different types of gravity observations is the key to obtaining a high-resolution and high-precision regional gravity model. Current studies based on spherical radial basis functions (SRBFs) majorly consider a single-level approach for data combination. Despite the promising results reported in numerous publications, it has been suspected that the single-level model might be biased towards high-resolution measurements. Instead, a multi-resolution representation (MRR) can be applied to further take into consideration the varying spectral sensitivities of different observation techniques. In this study, we develop a new MRR scheme based on the pyramid algorithm and sequential parameter estimation. We propose strategies to solve the challenges in the practical application of the pyramid algorithm, and this study represents its first successful realization in regional gravity field modeling. The modeling results based on both simulated and real gravity data show that either the single-level approach or the MRR without pyramid algorithm is able to capture gravity information from lower resolution measurements as sufficient as our newly developed MRR algorithm. In the simulated case, the RMS error w.r.t. the validation data obtained by the MRR based on the pyramid algorithm decreases by 50% and 35%, in comparison to that of the single-level model and the MRR without pyramid algorithm, respectively. In the real case, the improvement achieved by the MRR based on the pyramid algorithm is 35% and 23% in the onshore area, and it reaches 63% and 57% in the offshore area, compared to the single-level approach and the MRR without pyramid algorithm, respectively.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computers in Earth Sciences,Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics
Reference54 articles.
1. Ågren J, Strykowski G, Bilker-Koivula M, Omang O, Märdla S, Forsberg R, Ellmann A, Oja T, Liepins I, Parseliunas E, Kaminskis J, Sjöberg L, Valsson G (2016) The NKG2015 gravimetric geoid model for the Nordic-Baltic region. In: 1st Joint Commission 2 and IGFS Meeting International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems, pp 19–23, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20765.20969
2. Andersen O, Knudsen P (2019) The DTU17 global marine gravity field: First validation results. In: Fiducial reference measurements for altimetry. Springer, pp 83–87, https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2019_65
3. Austen G, Grafarend E (2004) Gravitational field recovery from GRACE data of type high-low and low-low SST. In: Proceedings of the Joint CHAMP/GRACE science meeting
4. Bentel K, Schmidt M, Denby CR (2013a) Artifacts in regional gravity representations with spherical radial basis functions. J Geod Sci 3:173–187. https://doi.org/10.2478/jogs-2013-0029
5. Bentel K, Schmidt M, Gerlach C (2013b) Different radial basis functions and their applicability for regional gravity field representation on the sphere. Int J Geomath 4:67–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13137-012-0046-1
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献