Abstract
AbstractThe Argentinean–German Geodetic Observatory (AGGO) is a fundamental geodetic observatory located close to the city of La Plata, Argentina. Two high-precision gravity meters are installed at AGGO: the superconducting gravimeter SG038, which is in operation since December 2015, and the absolute gravimeter FG5-227, which has provided absolute gravity measurements since January 2018. By co-location of gravity observations from both meters between January 2018 and March 2019, calibration factor and instrumental drift of the SG038 were determined. The calibration factor of the SG038 was estimated by different strategies: from tidal models, dedicated absolute gravity measurements over several days and a joint approach (including the determination of the instrumental drift) using all available absolute gravity data. The final calibration factor differs from the determination at the previous station, the transportable integrated geodetic observatory, in Concepcion, Chile, by only 0.7‰, which does not imply a significant change. From the combined approach also the mean absolute level of the SG was determined, allowing to predict absolute gravity values from the SG at any time based on a repeatability of $$12\,\hbox {nm}/\hbox {s}^{2}$$
12
nm
/
s
2
for the FG5-227 at AGGO. Such a continuous gravity reference function provides the basis for a comparison site for absolute gravimeters in the frame of the international gravity reference frame for South America and the Caribbean. However, it requires the assessment of the total error budget of the FG5-227, including the link to the international comparisons, which will be subject of future efforts.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computers in Earth Sciences,Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics
Reference38 articles.
1. Antokoletz ED, Wziontek H, Tocho C (2017) First six months of superconducting gravimetry in Argentina. In: Vergos G, Pail R, Barzaghi R (eds) International symposium on gravity, geoid and height systems 2016 International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 148. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2017_13
2. Baker TF, Bos MS (2003) Validating earth and ocean tide models using tidal gravity measurements. Geophys J Int 152(2):468–485
3. Carrere L, Lyard F, Cancet M, Guillot A, & Picot N (2016) FES 2014, a new tidal model-Validation results and perspectives for improvements. In: Proceedings of the ESA living planet symposium
4. Dehant V, Defraigne P, Wahr JM (1999) Tides for a convective earth. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 104(B1):1035–1058. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JB900051
5. Drewes H, Kuglitsch F (eds) (2019) IAG Reports 2015–2019 (Travaux de l’AIG vol 41), pp 147–149. https://iag.dgfi.tum.de/fileadmin/IAG-docs/Travaux_2015-2019.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2020
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献