Mapping the postwar legacies of eugenics in socialist countries: a conceptual history of eugenics in Hungary

Author:

Kakuk PéterORCID,Sándor JuditORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe paper aims to understand the various legacies of eugenics in the postwar period to recognize both the continuities and discontinuities of eugenics with an approach which is both conceptually sound and historically correct. Building on earlier work of Lene Koch, the paper endeavours to chart the historical trajectory of eugenics by examining how its definition and those of its related or oppositional concepts have evolved within selected lexicon entries across various stages of the century. The inclusion and publication of a concept within a lexicon indicate its significance, linguistic vitality, and prevalence in public discourse. These entries serve as a window into the contemporary understanding and application of concepts over an entire century, offering insights into the practices of eugenics as interpreted by the authoritative scholars of the era. Additionally, these lexicon entries offer more than just a mirror to the past’s prevailing attitudes. The very act of articulating a concept may be viewed as a pivotal element in social struggles, influencing the course of eugenic practices and their interpretations. Both conceptual history and discourse analysis share common ground in their perception of concepts, considering the use of language as a social activity endowed with performative capabilities. They recognize that language does not merely reflect reality but can actively shape it, playing a significant role in societal dynamics and power relations. The Hungarian lexicon entries on eugenics reveal notable disparities in the identified content, the periodization, and the evolution of changes when compared to Lene Koch’s earlier study on Scandinavian eugenics. In Hungary, the concept of eugenics underwent significant changes over four successive periods. The history and interpretation of eugenics can vary significantly from one country to another. Different nations have had their unique experiences and trajectories with the eugenics movement, which have been shaped by their specific cultural, political, and social contexts. These variations emphasize the importance of considering the localized and historical perspectives when examining the concept of eugenics.

Funder

HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council

Central European University Private University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference44 articles.

1. Adams, Mark B. 1990. The wellborn science: Eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia. Oxford: OUP.

2. Alison, Bashford. 2010. Where did eugenics go? In The Oxford handbook of the history of eugenics, ed. A. Bashford and P. Levine. Oxford: University Press.

3. Anomaly, Jonathan. 2022. Race, eugenics and the holocaust. In Bioethics and the holocaust—A comprehensive study in how the holocaust continues to shape the ethics of health, medicine and human rights, ed. S. Gallin and I. Bedzow. Cham: Springer.

4. Brittannica Hungarica Világenciklopédia (1996) Nádori Attila (ed), 6. Volume, entry “Eugenika” Budapest: Magyar Világ Kiadó Kft., 1996

5. Cavaliere, Giulia. 2018. Looking into the shadow: The eugenics argument in debates on reproductive technologies and practices. Monash Bioethics Review 36: 1–22.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3