The problem with reproductive freedom. Procreation beyond procreators’ interests-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The problem with reproductive freedom. Procreation beyond procreators’ interests

Published:2019-08-14 Issue:1 Volume:23 Page:131-140
ISSN:1386-7423
Container-title:Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
language:en
Short-container-title:Med Health Care and Philos

Author:

Cavaliere Giulia^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Education,Health(social science)

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11019-019-09917-3.pdf

Reference63 articles.

1. Adams, Mark B. 1990. The wellborn science: Eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Anomaly, Jonathan. 2014. Public goods and procreation. Monash Bioethics Review 32: 172–188.

3. Anomaly, Jonathan. 2018. Defending eugenics. Monash Bioethics Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-018-0081-2 .

4. Agar, Nicholas. 2008. Liberal eugenics: In defence of human enhancement. Oxford: Wiley.

5. Bashford, Alison. 2010. Epilogue: Where did eugenics go? In The Oxford handbook of the history of eugenics, ed. Alison Bashford and Philippa Levine, 539–558. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Conclusions;Feminist Bioethics in Space;2024-10-02

2. Antinatalism, Environmental Ethics, and Feminism;Feminist Bioethics in Space;2024-10-02

3. Feminist Bioethics of Human Enhancement;Feminist Bioethics in Space;2024-10-02

4. Disability in Space;Feminist Bioethics in Space;2024-10-02

5. Power and Exclusion in Space Exploration;Feminist Bioethics in Space;2024-10-02